[FEATURE] Audit authority, code quality and documentation in meta #3
Labels
No labels
bug
ci
docs
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
performance
phase-6
question
refactor
security
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
erix/meta#3
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Problem and motivation
This issue tracks continuous Phase 6 audit closure for
meta. Own canonical repository governance, contribution/security policies, document templates and shared issue/PR templates.An initial inventory is not a security or documentation closure claim. Evidence must follow each changed boundary through final heads, with priority security, reliability, then performance.
Proposed behavior and scope
Current targets: no Cargo targets. Validate the maintained scripts, workflow/templates and their tests; record Rust-only checks as individually not applicable with evidence.
There is no Cargo target or daemon startup inventory. Apply source authority, cleanup, limits and feature dimensions to governance/CI/template contracts and their propagation; document each runtime-specific non-applicability separately, with downstream enforcement evidence.
Authority, security and reliability
Maintain a finding register with public finding references, exact revisions, invariants, reproduction, owners, regression tests and closure evidence. Publish only non-sensitive status here; suspected vulnerabilities follow SECURITY.md. Each dimension below needs its own result and rationale; an absent daemon or current Rust target is not a blanket exemption.
Acceptance criteria
missing_docsenforcement without blanket allowances or hidden-API escapes, warning-denied private-item rustdoc and an undocumented-public-API negative gate.Alternatives and tradeoffs
Use cohesive local refactoring or a justified shared extraction only after identifying real common semantics and authority boundaries. Remove superseded paths after preserving maintained coverage. Profile before optimization; document unavoidable ABI/hardware limits and explicit quotas rather than weakening security for speed.
Tracking and rollout
feature/posix-compat; update linked WIP PRs after coherent signed checkpoints using canonical CONTRIBUTING.md messages.91b30d9a8ee8bf82093dbf575bc3f76a641012cd; refresh component/dependency heads and their own CI evidence as implementation advances.[FEATURE] [P02.R60] Audit authority, code quality and documentation in metato [FEATURE] Audit authority, code quality and documentation in meta